Patents: Not Necessary?

Posted in Uncategorized by mcarter on March 23rd, 2009

Mike Masnick at techdirt thinks patents are overrated. In fact, he thinks execution trumps patents every time when it comes to leading start-ups to success.

He blogs that if you’re talking to a VC who demands a patent to invest, you might be better served by looking elsewhere. Here’s a snippet on why he believes patents just aren’t necessary:

"…Over the years, we’ve seen more and more venture capitalists come to the realization that in many cases, patents do a lot more harm than good.

We’ve written about a few venture capitalists who have come out about problems with patents — and over the weekend Union Square Ventures’ Fred Wilson (a friend, and Techdirt reader), wrote about just how much damage patents have done towards innovation — specifically with some of his portfolio companies. Specifically, he’s talking about having those companies sued by non-practicing entities (he uses the term "trolls" which we like to avoid).

He also mentions — in the comments — how USV doesn’t require companies to have patents, and he’s invested in plenty of companies without patents."

No Tags
 
You can leave a response below, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply